HOA Fence and Wall Disputes: How Boards Should Document Decisions

Fences and walls generate a surprising number of HOA disputes. Who maintains the fence between two units? If a shared wall fails, who pays? Can an owner replace a fence with a different material? Who decides when a wall is structurally unsafe?

The board has to answer these questions — and those answers need to be in the minutes.

Maintenance Responsibility: The Threshold Question

Before the board can decide anything about a fence or wall dispute, it has to answer the foundational question: whose responsibility is it?

The answer is in the governing documents, but it's not always obvious:

• Common element fences: If the fence is designated as a common element in the declaration, it's the association's responsibility to maintain
• Limited common element fences: A fence that serves only one or two units may be a limited common element — the association owns it but the benefiting owner(s) may bear maintenance costs under the CC&Rs
• Lot line fences: In planned developments with individually owned lots, the fence on the property line may be each owner's responsibility to the centerline, or joint responsibility, depending on state law and the governing documents
• Owner-installed fences: Fences added by owners (with or without ARC approval) are typically owner-maintained

When a dispute comes to the board, document the governing document analysis specifically: "The board reviewed Article VII, Section 3 of the CC&Rs, which designates perimeter fencing as a common element. Accordingly, maintenance and repair responsibility lies with the association."

Repair vs. Replace Decisions

Fence and wall decisions often involve a repair-or-replace judgment. Document:

• The condition of the fence/wall (board inspection findings, contractor assessment)
• Repair options considered and costs
• Replacement options considered and costs
• The board's decision and rationale
• Vote

If the board deferred a decision pending additional information (a structural engineer's assessment, additional bids), document the deferral and assign a specific action item.

Shared Fences Between Owners

Disputes about fences between two units are among the most common — and most interpersonally fraught — issues boards handle. Key documentation points:

• Whether the board has jurisdiction: If the fence is between two privately owned lots and doesn't involve common elements, the board may not have authority to compel either owner to act. Document the jurisdictional analysis.
• Violation notices: If the board determines one owner is failing to maintain a fence they're responsible for, document the notice process — when notices were sent, what was required, compliance deadlines
• Mediation referrals: If the dispute is between two owners and the board lacks authority to resolve it, the board may direct the owners to mediation. Document that direction.

Boards should be careful not to adjudicate neighbor-versus-neighbor disputes that aren't governed by the CC&Rs. Document clearly when the board is declining jurisdiction and why.

ARC Approvals for Fence Changes

When an owner wants to replace or modify a fence, they typically need Architectural Review Committee approval. Document in the ARC meeting minutes or, if the full board is approving:

• Owner's request: location, proposed material, dimensions, style
• Whether the request complies with the ARC guidelines and CC&Rs
• Any conditions attached to approval (specific material, height limit, maintenance obligation)
• Vote to approve, approve with conditions, or deny
• Notice to the owner of the decision

If the board denies an ARC request, document the specific basis for denial — not just "doesn't fit the neighborhood aesthetic" but the specific guideline or CC&R provision that controls.

Safety and Liability Issues

When a fence or wall poses a safety risk — structurally compromised, leaning dangerously, blocking sightlines — the board has both the authority and the obligation to act. Document:

• How the safety issue was identified (complaint, inspection, incident)
• The board's assessment of risk and urgency
• Emergency authorization if immediate action was required
• Longer-term repair or replacement plan with vote

If the board is aware of a safety issue and fails to act, that failure will be in the minutes — or conspicuously absent from them. Act, and document the action.

Cost Allocation in Multi-Owner Situations

When a fence replacement benefits multiple owners or units, cost allocation must be documented:

• How costs were allocated (equally, by lineal footage, by assessed value, from reserves)
• The governing document basis for the allocation method
• Any special assessment vote if reserves are insufficient

Retaining Walls: A Special Case

Retaining walls present unique issues because they serve structural functions — they prevent soil movement and protect property. When a retaining wall fails or requires significant repair:

• Get a structural engineer's assessment before the board makes decisions
• Document the engineer's findings and recommendations in the minutes
• If the wall failure affects neighboring property, the liability exposure warrants legal consultation — note in the minutes that counsel was obtained
• Preservation of emergency repairs follows the same documentation pattern as any emergency authorization

Common Mistakes

• Deciding without citing the governing documents: "The board decided the fence is the association's problem" is not defensible. Cite the CC&R provision.
• Taking sides in owner-vs-owner disputes without jurisdiction: If the fence is between two privately owned lots and both owners are in compliance with HOA rules, the board may be overstepping. Document jurisdictional analysis.
• Deferring without documenting: "We'll look at it next month" needs to be recorded with an action item. Otherwise, the issue disappears from the record and the board looks negligent.
• Approving ARC requests verbally: Oral approvals are unenforceable. Document every ARC decision in writing and in the minutes.

Template Language

FENCE/WALL MATTER — [LOCATION] — [DATE]

Issue: [brief description]
Governing document basis: [CC&Rs Article/Section]
Responsibility determination: [Association / Owner / Shared]

Board decision: [repair / replace / violation notice / defer / decline jurisdiction]
Rationale: [brief]
Vote: [X-X]

Action items:
- [Task] — Owner: [name] — Due: [date]

Get the Documentation Right

Fence and wall disputes are low-drama until they're not — and when they escalate, the minutes become the primary record of what the board knew and decided. MinuteSmith generates structured draft minutes from your board meeting recordings, so dispute decisions are captured completely and consistently every time.

Try it free — no credit card required.